directory
More Romney Lies
by LiberatedWoman
Apr 28, 2012 | 905 views | 0 0 comments | 54 54 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Trying to take credit for the auto-industry-rescue policy he opposed, Romney claimed "the course I recommended was eventually followed."

No, not really.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/02/16/economist_devastates_romney_on_the_auto_bailout.html

 

As with much of Mr Romney's excessive rhetoric, there is some truth to this statement. Following the bail-outs, the president eventually forced Chrysler and GM into bankruptcy, a step Mr Romney thought should occur naturally. And the government oversaw painful restructurings at both companies, which were largely in line with Mr Romney's broad suggestions. But the course Mr Romney recommended in 2008 began with the government stepping back, and it is unlikely things would've turned out so well had this happened.
Free-marketeers that we are, The Economist agreed with Mr Romney at the time. But we later apologised for that position. "Had the government not stepped in, GM might have restructured under normal bankruptcy procedures, without putting public money at risk", we said. But "given the panic that gripped private purse-strings...it is more likely that GM would have been liquidated, sending a cascade of destruction through the supply chain on which its rivals, too, depended." Even Ford, which avoided bankruptcy, feared the industry would collapse if GM went down. At the time that seemed like a real possibility. The credit markets were bone-dry, making the privately financed bankruptcy that Mr Romney favoured improbable. He conveniently ignores this bit of history in claiming to have been right all along.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet