home bee county refugio county liveoak
Peña finds large sum of money in a brown paper bag, returns it to owner
by Rita Arnst
11 months ago | 1916 views | 8 8 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Amanda Peña found $1100 in a brown paper bag at Big Dawgs in Three Rivers and returned it to the owner.
view image
Amanda Peña of George West arises at 1:30 a.m. to go to work each morning. She delivers newspapers to area businesses for the San Antonio Express-News. This past Sunday morning while on one of her routes she found a large sum of money in a brown paper bag.

“At about 5:30 a.m., I was delivering newspapers at Big Dawgs in Three Rivers. They have a little bench by the door where I set my papers. At first I thought it was trash and was going to throw it away; but I have an agreement with the owner to leave his front page paper clippings of unsold newspapers in a bag. I picked up the brown bag and it felt heavy so I looked inside and saw there was a lot of money. My friend was with me and she said you need to call somebody. At that moment I couldn’t remember the owner’s name so I dialed 911 and told them I found a bag of money on the bench by the store,” said Peña.

According to public record from the Live Oak County Sheriff’s Office, Peña called 911 at 5:32 a.m. Three Rivers Police Officer Rey Medrano arrived on the scene within minutes and saw the bag not only contained money it also contained checks, credit card receipts and a deposit slip. The sheriff’s complaint log further indicates the bag presumably was holding the business’ night deposit. The business owner, Ruben Salazar, was summoned and the property was released to him at 6:20 a.m.

Officer Medrano said, “It is good to see honest, decent people like Miss Peña. With the economy the way it is, it could be tempting to keep the money. It’s great when people look out for one another. I hope Mr. Salazar acknowledges her and gives her a reward.”
comments (8)
« abbydoodle wrote on Wednesday, Sep 30 at 09:59 AM »
Neither did I say Amanda should not receive lots of kuddos. She should in every way. Both her employer and the company, Big Dawgs, should do something quietly to recognize her honesty. And it should not be a just a pat on the back.

That said. The entire article should have celebrated Amanda. There should have been no focus of the details of what was in the sack. As business manager finding the sack sends all sorts of red flags that some type of procedures and policy or policies were not followed ---intentionally or unintentionally.

If this was my business, I would be changing my habits...because thanks to the newspaper, (and criminals can read --at least some of them)they have announced that there is possibly a large cash flow leaving the store, in a brown paper back, probably when the store closes. Duh! This also means there is probably no safe...Duh! Man here are some opportunities to expand the coin in my pocket if I can get away with it...Duh!

So I am back to saying both the sheriff's department allowed too much information be released to the newspaper for print. And the newspaper reporter, did not consider the ramifications of reporting too much information in the story.

There is a fine line that reporters walk in journalism when trying to avoid censorship and protecting citizens.

The story should have been a glorious story for Amanda without the details of the sack. In fact all it had to say was it was found at one of the businesses on her route. It did not have to name the business.

It could have said the manager was called and identified the contents. There is a way to write the story so that that employees of the Big Dawg will not now be in danger when some fool gets a dimwhit idea.

Recommendations:

Change policies and procedures;

get a safe if you don't have one;

fire the employee that left the money outside

Sheriff's department reconsider how much information to release to protect a business and employees

Newspaper review editorial policy for stories to insure the story does not put other people's lives in danger in the future by disclosing too much information

Don't forget the key element --Amanda -the honest American.

« anonymous wrote on Wednesday, Sep 30 at 09:26 AM »
No one is saying that Amanda should not have been recognized...I think we are all in agreement that Amanda indeed acted as a "good samaritan" and was recognized as she should have been. I have no one to defend here either and I'm not quite sure what Earlybird refers to when they conclude that someone has a "casual interest in the story". I would feel the same about this issue regardless of the business this has happened to. I'm speaking from a business owner standpoint.

I simply meant before that this story could have given the wrong idea to certain people and that this business, or any others for that matter, could now be in danger.

What should have happened here was a simple article recognizing someone for their honesy, that's it. No crime was committed here and it's not like the community would have lost anything or felt something was "hidden" if some of the information was left out, plain and simple.

We all have our opinions and we are entitled to it. I guess we will not see eye to eye on this and agree to disagree. Have a great day!
« earlybird wrote on Monday, Sep 28 at 02:32 PM »
My original comment was about a local person acting as a Good Samaritan. I have no one to defend, but believe people have a right to open records/police reports and reporters have the right to cover the news. I would hate to see police reports hidden from the public or reporters censuring the news. I conclude that the author of the previous post must has more than a casual interest in this story.
« abbydoodle wrote on Monday, Sep 28 at 12:23 PM »
I do give atta girls to Amanda.

I give shame shame to the reporter. TMI about the issues.....there appears to either be a breakdown in procedures or there was an agreement for a crime. The Sheriff's department should have not released that much information. SHAME ON YOU TOO.

In today's world we the people don't need to know that much information. I agree that now this release of information could put employees in harms way. Will the newspaper be responsible. I vote yes.
« earlybird wrote on Monday, Sep 28 at 11:20 AM »
I disagree with the comment by anonymous. Amanda did the right thing and was recognized for that plain and simple. The employee made the mistake by leaving a paper bag of money out for anyone to come along and take. I think if I owned the business I would be looking for an more responsible employee if I thought this could happen again. I doubt that this newspaper article will have "bad people" laying in wait to have their time in the "spotlight".
« anonymous wrote on Friday, Sep 25 at 12:15 PM »
Although I feel that recognition for Amanda's honesty is great, the progress may have divulged too much information and now it seems people may be looking/waiting for another mistake to be made to have their time in the spotlight or simply for the reason to take what is left behind. There are just some things that people do not need to know because there are bad people out there that really would have not done what Amanda did. Again, props to Amanda for her honesty and we can all hope that nothing like this happens again or to anyone else.
« liveoak-chick wrote on Friday, Sep 25 at 09:48 AM »
Yeah way to go Amanda! I'm sure it wasn't an easy decision to make although a smart one since the cameras were rolling.
« earlybird wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 04:03 PM »
It's really good to know there are decent, hard working people out there that would turn over a bag of cash. Way to go Amanda!