Taxes, entitlements and freedom
Dec 12, 2012 | 937 views | 8 8 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Editor:

William Howard Taft signed the enactment of the 16th amendment on Feb. 7, 1913. This amendment gives the government the right to collect income tax. This president was a Republican, not a Democrat! Thanks to him, we have income tax.

The first tea rally took place in Boston, a city in the British colony of Massachusetts. The so-called patriots destroyed a lot of money in tea bags to protest the tax. This rally led up to the tearing up of Indian voter registration cards.

Now, 100 years later, the tea baggers are protesting taxes because of entitlement and healthcare and are trying to pass anti-immigration laws like the voter ID law. This group is like a renegade group from the KKK but much smarter and much more dangerous because they will align with the poor blacks and Hispanics and even the devil if they have to, only to make their point. Hispanics and blacks that support them want to continue being slaves and will say anything their bosses (patronas) tell them to say.

Entitlements are called welfare, freebees and commodities. Oh, did I say commodities? For the uninformed, the greatest commodity is your freedom, a commodity that veterans have paid a high price for, but, well, I guess for some you, the only good veteran is a dead veteran, because if you really cared, you wouldn’t try to deny us the help that we so need now. Our Social Security checks, VA benefits. Our health care! Our commodities.

A U.S. veteran, Cipriano Carabajal Perez
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
laselva
|
December 17, 2012
I believe I've made my point previously but I'll repeat it. Our huge defense industry and all the armed forces we (The U.S. taxpayer) fund, the infrastructure created at taxpayer expense such as highways, dams, airports, harbors, train depots, etc., etc., chiefly benefit the very rich (or our largest corporations, because they are now people too). For many years the "fair share" was about 50%-90% of profits and taxable income, and the country sailed along quite nicely. And even at those sky-hgh rates, they were still very rich.

What is a burden on the middle-class is the trillions of dollars we spend protecting these corporate entities and their "interests" around the globe. And this has been a policy of failure as our national debt proves, and our influence around the globe as a beacon of hope for democratic rule has been tarnished. Do we really need to have an army larger than all the armies of the world combined?

So, my point is, if the answer yes, we need all this defense, then those who benefit from it most should pay their "fair share." And I'll let the accounts determine what a fair share amounts to.
feelark
|
December 17, 2012
Totally agreed, laselva. Why a working-class taxpayer would come to the defense of someone who doesn't pay their fair share (and laughs all the way to the Caymans) is beyond me.
Saltpork
|
December 16, 2012
Lase again you speak to "their fair share." What is their fair share? Is it a number? A percentage of their income? Who determines that number or percentage? Whatever it is does it remain static for a period of time or is it a moving target determined by Obama, Reid or Pelosi?

All of this national debt will be the burden of the middle class. There just aren't enough rich people, too many poor people, while the largest segment of the population are somewhere in the range of the middle class. Based on sheer numbers the middle class will bear this burden.

DAbildgaard
|
December 20, 2012
Absolutely true!
laselva
|
December 13, 2012
Confused? Maybe the stream of consciousness style and disjointed thoughts all rolled into one paragraph might throw the reader off. But at the heart of this letter is a frustrated fellow citizen who has served his country by putting his life on the line for Americans and American Interests. Those interests seem to always involve access to others oil fields, precious metals and minerals, and at great cost to the US budget and taxpayer. To discover that these same folks don't want to pay their fair share for protecting their investments and "interests" sickens me and I believe is at the heart of Mr. Perez's letter.

The last ten years of wars costing the U.S. $2 trillion and climbing, plus the loss of thousands of lives, were not paid for by the usual method of raising taxes to pay for war. In fact, taxes were lowered for the very people who benefit the most from these wars..the very rich. And we wonder why the national debt has gotten so high. It's time to pay up. And in my opinion, should include all Americans.
Saltpork
|
December 13, 2012
You just have to love letters like this one. Look up "confused" in the dictionary and you'll find this letter right there in bold print.

As a fellow veteran, I would be more than happy to drive you to the VA for your medication.
FedUpPatriot
|
December 13, 2012
I was thinking, after I read the letter, "how do you respond to this drivel?" Great response,Saltpork.
DifferentView2
|
December 12, 2012
Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society.

--Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.