Image Map
buttongroup business directory
Deputy’s son to be cited in fatal traffic accident
by Gary Kent
2 years ago | 2929 views | 20 20 comments | 38 38 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Beeville Police Chief Joe Treviño said this week that his department will be sending court summonses to the driver and passenger of a 2005 Dodge Ram involved in a fatal accident on May 29.

Treviño said they will be cited for violating the state’s seat belt law.

Evidence at the scene indicated that 18-year-old Kyle Gisler, the driver, and his 19-year-old passenger, Casey Pargmann, did not have their seat belts on when Gisler’s truck hit the driver’s side door of a 2003 Ford Escape in the 1500 block of North Washington Street, according to a police report.

In addition, Gisler, the son of a Bee County sheriff’s deputy, will receive a summons on a charge of not having a current inspection sticker on his truck.

The accident killed 72-year-old Skidmore resident Antonio Nuncio instantly and injured his 27-year-old granddaughter, Diana Torres.

She was taken to Christus Spohn Hospital Beeville by the Angel Care Ambulance Service with pain in her left side.

Treviño said it is common practice for the Beeville Police Department to send traffic law violators court summonses in the mail following accidents in which someone is either killed or injured and taken to a hospital.

The chief said BPD investigators have served an evidentiary search warrant and taken custody of the “black box” that was in Gisler’s vehicle.

The box, Treviño said, may provide information that could tell investigators whether or not the two occupants of the truck were wearing seat belts and what speed the pickup was traveling when the accident occurred.

The chief said the black box will either be taken to the Texas Department of Public Safety or the San Antonio Police Department to be examined. He said both agencies can retrieve information from the device. But the SAPD may be able to have the evidence quickly.

Treviño said there is a 50-50 chance that the information investigators are seeking can be retrieved from the black box.

However, the BPD is covering all its bases in the investigation, the chief said.

Treviño said he has contacted the DPS and requested that special state accident investigators be sent to Beeville to reconstruct the accident and try to determine the speed of the pickup at the time the accident took place.

“I’m waiting for a phone call today from a DPS lieutenant,” Treviño said Monday. “We’re going to get that (reconstruction) done as soon as possible.”

“Additional charges could be filed depending on the outcome of the investigation,” Treviño added.

If the speed of the pickup is determined to be a contributing factor to the accident, as some witnesses have suggested, that information will be turned over to District Attorney Martha Warner and it will be up to her to decide if additional charges are filed against Gisler.

However, Treviño quickly pointed out that Nuncio obviously contributed to the accident by failing to yield right of way when he pulled out of West Inez Street and in front of the Gisler’s southbound pickup.

The chief said witnesses have reported that Nuncio stopped at the stop sign at the intersection. But Nuncio then drove into the thoroughfare and into the path of the pickup, Treviño reported.

Witnesses told police that Gisler’s pickup truck was traveling in the inside, southbound lane at the time of the accident but he was passing a vehicle in the outside lane. That, and vehicles parked at a nearby car parts business, could have made it hard for Nuncio to see the pickup coming, the chief said.

Treviño said there were no signs that either of the drivers had been drinking. He said a blood sample was taken from Gisler and it has been sent off for examination. It could be a couple of weeks before police know if there were any traces of alcohol or drugs in the sample.

“We’re going to do what’s right,” Treviño said. Just because Gisler is the son of a local law enforcement officer, that will have no bearing on the outcome of the investigation, Treviño vowed. “We don’t cover up anything. Don’t believe all the rumors you hear out there.”

Comments
(20)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
June 15, 2009
Speculations? Foundless innuendos? Fact! and the only Fact the matters is the vehicles inspection stickers was expired plain & simple, not legal to be driven on Texas roads. And that negligent act resulted in a death. A form of vehicular homicide. Whats worse the smalls towns disregard for the victim Mr. Nuncio. May he rest in peace. May justice be served.
JessChilln
|
June 15, 2009
"Please save the speculations and foundless innuendos until the the authorities present us with their findings." That's what has many concerned citizens still posting comments even after 2 weeks. We've lived here. We've seen this time and time again. Sometimes justice takes a backseat here just because of your last name. If you can't or haven't seen that, you're either new in this town or you're caught up in it somehow. It's happened, alot of people know it and the "wait and see" answer is all we've ever been given. And I can tell you firsthand, the truth is not always reflected in the reports or the findings. Small town politics are the worse.
anonymous
|
June 15, 2009
Concerned posters can have and post their opinions and most do NOT approve of someone causing the death of another under any circumstances!

The fact that the kid was driving a truck that was not legal to be on the road says it all, if he had not chose to violate the State Law, he would NOT have been involved in the death of another human being with that truck on that day.

cloakndaggermybad
|
June 14, 2009


in response to all concerned posters

This tragedy happened two weeks ago. Yes, the level of concern is most obviously there-advocates for the victims,haters of others, self-appointed "magistrates of morality" , common-sense, hard-working, religious families -everyone has strong feelings and "bomb-proof" theories as to what elements combined and produced the horrific traffic event on the afternoon of 5/29/09. Please, everyone, be patient!

We won't know what happened until the combined

law enforcement agencies complete their investigations. Their singular and collective findings will be matters of public records, so we will be able to read and( if necessary)research their results.

Please save the speculations and foundless innuendos until the the authorities present us with their findings.

Personally, I don't do my best work when pressed to complete a "rush job". I suspect most of you feel the same. Please be patient and wait until the authorities have been given sufficient time and resources in order to deal with this case and to continue their 24/7 jobs of keeping all of safe.
anonymous
|
June 14, 2009
WOW getgrip you need to get one for sure!

His sticker was illegal for less than one month? Oh so, when's the cut off? One day is still illegal, that's like saying you're only a less than one monthg pregnant...you're still pregnant, and he was still operating a vehicle that was NOT legal to be driven! PERIOD! Grip That!
JessChilln
|
June 14, 2009
Getagrip...a life was lost due to someone's irresponsibility and that IS a big deal. No one is saying that young Gisler intended any of this to happen. That's why it's called an accident. However, the accident came at a cost...and now a family is left grieving a loved one and unfortunately, like it or not, someone was at fault. If he was speeding, as witnesses say he was, then that definitely did contribute to the chain of events which resulted in the victim losing his life. Furthermore, are you so naive that b/c his inspection sticker had expired less than a month prior to the accident that makes it alright. Expired means it is no longer valid, i.e. illegal. That is a poor excuse as a defense to prosecution. That law does not even fall to interpretation. That is why many citizens are concerned how this accident will be investigated. The police department here has a long history of "interpreting" the law the way they see fit and there have been many incidents where they're judgement was less than logical. Remember, what's right isn't always what's popular. What's popular isn't always what right.
getagrip
|
June 14, 2009
WOW...First he was guilty because he was speeding. That hasn't been proven yet, so then you all jumped on the wagon saying he killed someone because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. And now he killed somone because his inspection sticker had expired less than 1 month before the accident. WOW....You people are something else! One day you will have something bad happen to you in your life. I just hope you don't have people like YOU judging everything dealing with your bad experience in life.

Blastoderm55
|
June 13, 2009
The point about the expired inspection is a good one. I guess we'll just have to see how this all unfolds.
JessChilln
|
June 12, 2009
I've always found that when someone does not have a current inspection sticker, it is usually because they do not have insurance or because of a defect with the vehicle that would prohibit them from passing the state vehicle inspection. I don't mean to jump to conclusions (there's enough of that to go around)I'm just curious as to why the son of a Bee County Sheriff's Office deputy is operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway with an expired inspection sticker. Was the vehicle insured? Was there an existing defect in the vehicle that prevented it from passing the inspection? I'm asking these questions b/c nobody else (B.P.D.) seems to be. There are good officers in the police department, but they're inexperienced as well. What other police department in a city the size of Beeville promotes new recruits up to patrol sgt. so quickly? These are scary times my friends. New cars and snazzy uniforms only carry you so far....You can put a $3,000 Armani suit on a chimp but all you'll have is a well dressed chimp.
donschmidt
|
June 12, 2009
That certainly sums up the situation, that truck should have never been on the road.

I went on a ride along a couple of years ago and the officer pulled a over car for speeding and going over the median to get past cars. When the officer ask the driver for his license, registration and proof of insurance, he handed him everything but the proof of insurance, when the officer ask where his insurance card was he said that's where he was going he was on his way to get insurance that's why he was in such a hurry...being a seasoned officer the officer did not fall for that line of bull and ticketed him and his car was towed. Thankfully the officer caught him before he was able to kill an innocent driver or pedestrian.

It has been my experience when someone has such a disregard for Texas Laws they are the very ones causing grief for the rest of law abiding citizens.

To help those that do not have common sense or otherwise it is ILLEGAL to drive in Texas without a valid drivers license, without a valid inspection sticker, without valid registration, without current insurance and proof there of..if you or your auto does not have these neither you or your auto should be on the road.
anonymous
|
June 12, 2009
common sense? Is that something you need to take anothers life? That vehicle should not have been on the road period! It doesn't take much sense to know that! If a vehicles inspection sticker is expired the vehicle is NOT legal to be driven on any Texas Road, Street, Highway So NO!, the kid did NOT have the right of way! and if the son of a deputy doesn't have any better sense than that then what kind of sense does the deputy have...?
JessChilln
|
June 12, 2009
It would appear to me if the young Gisler's vehicle's inspection sticker was expired (as mentioned above), said vehicle should not have been operated anywhere on a public roadway or street. Plus, skid marks (if there were any) lengths in combination w/ the P.O.I. can easily determine the rate of speed the vehicle was traeling when it collided into the victim's truck. Light bulbs in the turning signal light should also be an indicator if the turn signal was even used by Gisler as he was passing the other uninvolved motorist prior to colliding into the victim. A broken bulb filament would indicate that the signal light was off. If the filament was unbroken, it would indicate that the light was on (filament hot/soft). If the Beeville Police Dept. is not aware of such basic accident scene investigative techniques, then no wonder they have to rely on a "black box" and help from DPS. Come on Chief Trevino, you can do better than that. Keep up the good farce...I mean force.
Blastoderm55
|
June 12, 2009
Its common sense driving that on that stretch of St. Mary's/Washington that the driver has right of way and that all the side street yield until the lights at the ending intersections of Huntington and FM 351.
anonymous
|
June 12, 2009
where did it say in the report that the kid had the right of way? accident? more like crash. accidents are incidents that cannot be helped.

its more unfortunate for the family that lost their loved one at least the kid gets to go home to his family unlike the victim.

I think the witness that said the kid quickly darted around another car while airing his horn at them for not going as fast as him or getting out of his way and then he struck a vehicle and killed a person. Gave a great description of kids these days driving around in their parents vehicles.
Blastoderm55
|
June 12, 2009
Its easy to get consumed by the emotional impact that this accident has. However, if this accident had not occured in a fatality, who would have been cited? Its easy to jump all over the kid, but even if he was not driving while following all laws of the road, he still had the right of way. Its just unfortunate for everyone involved.
buckleup its the law
|
June 12, 2009
it is true the deputy's son either learned from example or didn't...

if the deputy's son is violating a simple to comply with law by not wearing a seat belt, then it makes one wonder...

annie148
|
June 12, 2009
Is there no "edit" function on this blog? I should have ended the last two paragraphs with question marks.
annie148
|
June 12, 2009
BTW, the first part of my previous comment was directed to Stephanie24 (?). What happened to her post? She may have a legitimate concern.

Enzo,

To what rumors are you referring? That the boy will get off with just a citation? What if the FACTS in the case determine that he was not at fault?

Do you think they should charge him with a crime he did not commit just to satisfy people's blood thirst? What if you replaced the phrase "deputy's son" with "Hispanic man" or African American" or any other group, do you think it would be fair to assume somebody is guilty just because of the circumstances of their birth.

If he's proven guilty, he should suffer the consequences; if not, he should not be castigated because of who his parents are. Can we agree that people should not be judged by anything other than their actions.
annie148
|
June 12, 2009
I do not know what the past history of Beeville was like in covering up crimes, but it would nice to see people waiting for the FACTS to come out before PRE-JUDGING. I don't know the facts about the case. There are many things which could have happened. The man could have turned left in front of the boy's vehicle. The boy could have been speeding. I don't think he should be judged before the facts come out just because he is a deputy's son.

I am grateful for the cops in Beeville; but then again I am a law abiding citizen and haven't had any negative interactions with them. What's your beef? Have you unfairly been accosted by them? Do you have a problem with criminals in Beeville too or is it just cops?

Cloakndagger,

I like your response and I also think prayers are in order for both families.

Let the light shine on the truth and healing be done!
cloakndaggermybad
|
June 11, 2009


Prayers for both families devastated by this tragedy. Let's hope that the "black box" from Kyle's truck will provide some definitive answers.

Just curious though, does anyone know anything about skid marks from the truck? I don't recall reading anything about them.